Chamber data acquisition & compliance software
The QA report doesn’t stop at PASS. It measures the condition itself (MKT, the joint temperature / humidity window, time in tolerance) and says why when a figure can’t be calculated or is incomplete.
No chamber needed — the free trial runs a built-in virtual Watlow® F4T, with a stability chamber demo ready to start.
Flagged for review — an excursion outside the tolerance band, on a step whose criticality does not fail the run
How this verdict is decided: FAIL if any Critical step alarmed. REVIEW if any Critical step warned, any Advisory step alarmed, a breach was withheld, the run or any judged step was not fully observed, or a judged step was never reached. PASS otherwise. Joint-window figures are measurements, not part of the verdict.
Soak Scorecard
| Condition | Soak (min) | Joint window | Longest hold | T in band | RH in band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 °C / 60 %RH steps 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 load held in band | 420.0 | 98.5 % | 176.9 min | 98.7 % | 98.5 % |
Overview
A quick introduction to running, logging, and proving every test on your chamber network.
Why ProcessView+
Run the network, log every reading, and generate the proof — from a single screen, with no scripting and no integrators.
21 CFR Part 11 and AMS 2750 ready. Hash-chained audit trail, electronic signatures, an optional tamper-evident data-log backup, and role-based access across five roles — operator, technician, supervisor, QA reviewer, and administrator. Signing authority is granted per user, on top of whichever role they hold.
Edit and create temperature profiles. Download, read, start, stop, pause, and resume — one chamber or all 25 — from a single screen.
SQL Server mirroring to your enterprise database. MQTT streaming to your own broker, self-hosted or on AWS or Azure. Web and mobile dashboards. Email and SMS alerts.
Every run measured against its own condition — joint window, MKT, time in tolerance and sample coverage — beside a three-state verdict on the QA report. What gets measured
Run analytics
Every run is measured the moment it ends, and every figure goes on the QA report next to the verdict. Six questions an auditor asks, answered from the run’s own data.
Setpoint-pair dwell
Two per-loop percentages can’t tell you. The joint window can: the share of the soak with temperature and humidity in band together.
Mean kinetic temperature
Per channel, in the channel’s own unit, over the whole run including ramps. A partial record says how partial.
Time in tolerance
Measured against the bands the run started with, not today’s settings. A channel with no band scores nothing, not 100%.
Sample coverage
Readings repeated during a communication outage are marked, left out of the time-in-tolerance and joint-window figures, and the coverage is stated beside the verdict.
Dew point & absolute humidity
Per IAPWS-IF97, the published international formulation, cited on the report.
AMS 2750 survey
Per soak, with hottest, coldest, survey ΔT and the furnace class band of setpoint.
Numbers you can defend
Software that fills a blank with a plausible number is the fastest way to fail an audit. When ProcessView+ can’t calculate a figure, it says why, on the report, where an auditor will read it.
A band with missing limits
No tolerance band was recorded for this channel, so there is no time in tolerance to report. This is not 100% — nothing was being judged.Never scored as a perfect channel.
A gap in the record
25.11 °C (partial — 98.7% coverage, 4 rows missing across 1 gap)The figure, and exactly how much of the run it covers.
A run nobody can vouch for
N/ARun status not recorded for this sessionNot a failure it can’t prove, and not a pass it can’t prove either.
Proof
Every screenshot below is the shipping application, and each one is here because it shows a specific thing the software does.
Electronic signatures
The dialog states what is being signed before it will accept a PIN — recipe, run start, run end, and the verdict being attested — and records the meaning of the signature and a reason alongside it. The signature is CMS/PKCS#7 with ECDSA P-256, bound to that exact record, and the signer, meaning and UTC time go into the audit trail.
Proves the signer sees exactly what they are attesting to
Network view
Alarm state, active profile, step and time remaining for the whole network at once — and the connection column mixes freely — two of these carry an IP address and are Modbus TCP on the LAN, while "Slave #: 2" is a serial RTU node on the same screen, in the same table.
Proves TCP and RTU chambers run side by side on one network
QA reports
A finished run becomes a report carrying its own provenance — recipe, cycle start and end, operators, and the session it came from — with the verdict, the rule it was decided by, and a Soak Scorecard for each held condition on the cover. Example report, from simulated data.
Proves the verdict is attached to an identifiable run
Audit trail
Actions taken through the application are written the moment they happen, with the old value, the new value, the user, and a UTC timestamp. Records are hash-chained to each other, so a deletion or an edit breaks the chain and is detectable.
Proves the record is attributable and tamper-evident
AMS 2750
Thermal uniformity surveys are built from recorded sensor data rather than typed up afterwards — spread, maximum deviation, and hot and cold spot per sensor, with the pass/fail evaluated against the tolerance for the class. Example survey, from simulated sensor data.
Proves the survey is derived from the data, not transcribed
Simulation Mode
The trial boots a virtual Watlow F4T and runs it for real — the demo profile above ramped and recovered on its own. It is not a canned demo: the virtual controller answers Modbus on loopback, so the application connects, polls, reads and writes exactly as it does against hardware. Simulated records are kept out of the regulated audit trail, and the trail records when simulation ran.
Proves the software can be evaluated end to end without hardware
Run history
Overlay a run on its history to see drift before it becomes a deviation. Every archived run stays queryable in the local database, so the comparison is against your own record.
Proves drift is visible before it becomes a failure
Architecture
ProcessView+ writes every sample to a SQLite database on your own machine, and everything downstream reads from that one record. No third-party hosting, no nightly export.
Chamber network
Up to 25 controllers · Modbus TCP / RTU
The record
A database on your machine
SQLite · written once per sample · integrity hash-chained
Industries
Try it: Stability Demo · 25 °C / 60 %RH
Try it: 85/85 Steady State · 85 °C / 85 %RH
Try it: TUS Demo · Class 2 survey at 250 °F
For your IT team
ProcessView+ mirrors live process data to your existing Microsoft SQL Server in real time. No exports, no nightly batch jobs, no third-party data hosting required. Your BI, reporting, and analytics tools see chamber data the moment it is recorded.
For cloud-first environments, the same data streams over MQTT to a self-hosted broker, which you can run on AWS or Azure.
| Controllers | Watlow® F4T, F4, EZ-Zone® PM, Future Design® MCT4 |
| Capacity | Up to 25 networked controllers |
| Networking | Modbus TCP/IP, RTU, STD BUS gateway |
| Operating system | Windows 10, 11 |
| External databases | Microsoft SQL Server, Azure SQL |
| Cloud & IoT | MQTT v5 to your own broker, with optional TLS 1.2 and certificate pinning; web and mobile dashboards |
| Compliance | 21 CFR Part 11, AMS 2750, audit trail, e-signatures |
The free trial includes four demonstrations on a built-in controller simulator: a stability chamber, an 85/85 damp-heat test, a temperature/humidity cycle and a furnace survey. Each ends in a judged run and a QA report. At the 4× demo clock the stability run takes about 10 minutes. No hardware needed.